|
HETHER
YOU WANT to offer your comments on a virtual soapbox, or submit
them to be considered for broadcast on KUER-FM 90, the "Raise
Your Voice" forum offers you the chance to tell candidates
and fellow voters what you think.
Based on the number of submissions, KUER
news staff may ask one or two citizens to read their comments
in the studio, then they will be put them on the air.
Examples of comments from the 2000 election:
Posted 11/3:
When I hear politicians talk about increasing teacher accountability,
it makes my blood boil. How can politicians expect a teacher
to teach to their best potential if they don't have enough
books for their students? And don't politicians know that
teachers ARE accountable to their department heads and school
principals?
To me, use of the phrase "increased teacher accountability"
shows a politician who doesn't really understand public education,
so they're picking up the latest buzzword which they think
will make them sound informed. Politicians should worry less
about teacher accountability, and more about their own personal
accountability when it comes to voting more money for Utah
schools.
Keri Hains Riker
Orem, Utah
Posted 10/31:
With regard to Initiative B:
1. I believe we should enact legislation
to "prohibit the civil forfeiture of property owned by an
'innocent owner,'" (which involves voting 'Yes'). Those not
involved in a crime should not pay for it.
2. However, I also believe we should
continue to allow properties seized to appropriately be used
to fund special operations to halt drug trafficking problems,
etc. (which involves voting 'No'). This is a logical use for
these monies which result from related crimes, and funds are
definitely needed to support law enforcement. While there
can be some disincentive for police to acquire and use these
funds correctly, this is countered by rules restricting use
only for non-routine enforcement measures and regulations
about the manner in which the property is taken. I choose
to trust and work with law enforcement organizations in their
efforts rather than take away power they need.
It appears that right now the way to
achieve the two objectives above is to vote 'No' and later
work toward the very necessary protection of innocent owners'
property rights. There are too many detrimental aspects to
the current initiative to warrant a supporting vote.
Laura Duffin
Midvale, Utah
Posted 10/31:
I find it interesting that one item is
being completely ignored all across every campaign. Who are
the most important people in America? The one's who provide
us with high speed Internet, cell phones, etc.? Or is it the
hard working people who are making cars, moving real estate,
etc.?
I think there is a group of people more
important than them all, and I know you will agree when you
read what I mean. All of the above could be done without,
but we could not live without food. So why is it that the
American farmer is being discounted as completely unimportant
and left out. My father is a dairy farmer who is making less
money now, per pound of milk, than he did in the early '70s.
I think something is wrong here, don't you? Well, I am certain
that we all would if we suddenly lost the privilege of purchasing
a gallon of milk, or some cheese, or ice cream, etc. Then
maybe we would have something to say about their awful wages.
Those of you who are somewhat naive will suggest there are
many government programs offering assistance to farmers. The
last time my dad went to get some such "assistance" he was
going to be given a $100, and along with that a contract to
abide by government standards that took away freedom of choice
in running the farm. Gee, thanks. When are we going to wake
up and see that the commodities we live on are what fuel this
society? It has nothing to do with computer chips and technology.
Take away food, and nothing else matters. I just wish we'd
start treating the matter that way, so that my family and
thousands of others could stop living in the poverty level
of income while trying to run a business in the year 2000,
on wages that became obsolete 30 years ago.
If you think I am only worried about
myself and my family, any farmer of any type, almost, can
tell you that they are having just as difficult of times.
Many of them are losing land that has been in there families
for generations, and instead of being able to live out their
dreams, are being forced to give up. If the auto workers,
secretaries, teachers, pizza delivery people, or anyone were
to suddenly be given paychecks identical to the ones they
received 30 years ago, how long would that last? Or any other
business in the country, for that matter. Obviously, it just
wouldn't happen. Why are we letting it happen to those individuals
that are providing us life on a daily basis?
Michael Haderlie
Ogden, Utah
Posted 10/24:
I think the candidates for state offices
and Congress are ducking several issues:
(1) nuclear waste -- why must the nuclear
industry play a shell game with their waste, instead of storing
it on site, and why must taxpayers subsidize the industry
by assuming ownership of the waste? If the utility industry
had to absorb the real cost of its activities, like the rest
of us, it would shift to other energy sources on its own.
(2) campaign finance -- why should the
price of advertisements on television determine who shapes
the issues discussed in the elections, consider, for example,
that two of the three major TV networks, and scores of local
radio stations, are owned by the nuclear power industry. We
should be discussing public financing of elections;
(3) what ever happened to health care
reform? NO ONE is satisfied with the current system (except
some insurance company executives), yet none of the candidates
seem interested in discussing either federal OR STATE initiatives
to guarantee affordable, and understandable, health insurance;
(4) what about state funding for higher
education -- as a student I support a tuition increase in
any amount . . . if the state increases its appropriation
to higher education by the same percentage -- tuition increases
and state appropriations should be linked by statute; I don't
think the Utah legislature pays its fair share, and consequently,
many worthy students are priced out of an education, and many
good educators are priced out of Utah.
Bern Haggerty
Salt Lake City, Utah
Posted 10/18:
I appreciate this web site and the
reliable information it offers. I think it is important to
make sure the information we use to make decisions in an election
is reliable and correct. An earlier comment was made about
a bill in congress (602p). This is a well known hoax that
has been circulated on the Internet for years now. With only
a minimal amount of research this fact can be found out. To
cast a vote made on false information is as bad or worse as
not voting at all. I hope voters will be concerned enough
to do their homework and find out the truth of the issues,
not become inflamed over false or misleading information.
Kimberly Clarke
Washington Terrace, Utah
Posted 10/17:
i think new elects should consider
that they dont have solutions to all the
problems past officials have left undone
but to agree to take into consideration
all the challenges that may face them in office.
furthermore they should all consider
the way alcohol is managed in the state
of utah
it is managed by the church at a profit
to and for state controlled liquor stores
put the content to 6%
and let entrepenuers open up shop
we also need to focus on extracurricular activities for the
students of utah schools
for instance
more utilities in the parks
such as volleyball nets
and places not restricted to skate boarders
they deserve the rights of bicyclists
such as bike lanes
its all transportation issues
people who bike to work should be
permitted to write off 75% of their
automobile, state and road tax
because they do not pollute
and furthermore do not do any damage to roads and therefore
should not pay for
the maintenance of our highways
except for 25% because we all drive sometimes.
anyone considering office should of course consider who they
are working for
us the people
how can we live in free society
if our elders are making our decisions
its like being twelve again and being
grounded on certain issues
we need to take all public control
away from the churches, they should only
have the power to influence
religion, for those who chose it.....
and not condemn those of us who decide
to take a higher wisdomized path in life
because beleive it or not
the church here in utah, uses its influential power to slow
growth
in all criteria, unlesss it pertains
directly to its members businesses
all around the church hurts productivity
in this nice state
old issues being brought into play
only benefit older generations
their chance to speak should be over
let go of power i say
and transfer it into the hands that will be here longer
Richard Daniel Bunker
Salt Lake City, Utah
Posted 10/16:
With all the talk about education, I
do not believe that the state leaders have done enought to
raise teacher salaries. If they are serious about attracting
good teachers they must have a SIGNIFICANT pay raise. I am
talking about a 30-50 percent salary increase.
They deserve to be better compensated
for the service they provide to the state. It is pitiful that
our society puts so little value on the work of these public
school teachers. The long-term consequences of our neglect
could be devastating.
Governor Leavitt: Instead of reducing
the sales tax by 1/8 of 1 percent as you say you have, take
that money and even a little more and funnel it to the teachers.
DIRECTLY to the teachers. I believe that the majority in the
state are willing to pay 1/8 of 1 percent more taxes for this
to happen.
Whichever candidate will support the
idea that our teachers deserve more will get my vote. Not
just incremental increases over time with lots of rhetoric
to go along with it. I want a quicker and more substantial
response.
It is almost insulting to the teachers
to offer them minute increases if they will work even harder
to meet excellence standards set by the state. They are already
doing a good job. We need to recompense them for this. Thank
you.
Daniel Ware
Lehi, Utah
Posted 10/16:
If a sign was posted on our church or
school "Leave Your Guns Home !" or "No Guns Allowed Here !"
The law abiding citizens would not bring Guns in. How are
you going to keep the criminals (who don't care about the
law) from having free reign in that school or church? Maybe
you can enforce the laws that are already on the books, and
ensure our security!
Gov. Leavitt has stated many times,
that "education is better off now" ... HUH... FACT.. class
sizes are larger and education pay is one of the lowest in
the nation...! How will we be able to keep Quality Educators,
if they are not reasonably compensated?
COMMENT: I believe that if we take
good care of and educate our children, educate them through
college, then we will be able to close the prison doors!
Mike Millet
West Valley City, Utah
Posted 10/16:
A recent e-mail was sent to me on 10/12/00
regarding a bill that the federal government is trying to
slip a bill (bill 602p) that would allow a .5 cent charge
on e-mails sent. The postal service is complaining that they
are losing x amount of dollars every year due to free e-mail
services. In the editorial on March 6th 1999 is more information.
Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a $20.00 - $40.00 sur
charge for internet service.
How far are we going to let OUR elected
officials go before we put an end to them taxing us to death.
J. Charlesworth
Utah
Posted 10/16:
What is initiative A (English as the
Official Language of Utah)? I don't understand the extent
of the law. Especially the second line of the law:
"(2) exempt those documents and actions
required by the United States and Utah constitutions; federal
law and regulations; law enforcement, public safety and health
requirements; public and higher education; certain judicial
proceedings; economic development and tourism; and libraries;"
Does this mean that these areas will
or will not be using English only? For example, judicial proceedings,
will this mean that all printed legal documents will be in
English? Or does this mean that these areas will be able to
operate in multiple languages?
Dixie Crowther West Jordan, Salt Lake
County, UT
Posted 10/12:
I was in the Army during World War II
and at 18, not eligible to vote. I became eligible in 1954
and was so proud to finally get the privilege of voting. I
have not missed any elections since then and am keeping up
my voting privilege.
I don`t comprehend anyone who fails
to vote. It is an exceptional privilege given to us by our
democractic country. I always felt that my one vote could
possibly be the decisive vote.
Check the candidates and vote your
choice after getting the facts needed to vote wisely. Remember,
it is a privilege that millions throughout the world do not
have.
Please vote!
|